An AI-generated video shared by President Trump on Truth Social presents a fantasy version of Gaza as a luxury resort, which has drawn significant backlash for its unrealistic depiction of the war-torn area.

In response to the ongoing discussions, Arab leaders from Egypt, Jordan, and the UAE recently convened to discuss a reconstruction plan for Gaza that would not involve relocating its population.

Hamas spokesperson Basem Naim criticized the video for being disconnected from Palestinian culture, stressing the need for genuine improvement rather than superficial changes in Gaza.

The video, captioned 'Gaza 2025, what's next?', showcases an imagined future filled with prosperity and reconstruction efforts, contrasting sharply with the current dire conditions.

Palestinian authorities and Arab states have strongly opposed Trump's proposal, emphasizing that Palestinian rights are non-negotiable, while Hamas dismissed the idea as absurd.

Despite facing criticism from regional leaders and some Republican critics, Trump maintains that his plan to take control of Gaza and resettle Palestinians is viable, asserting he will not force it upon anyone.

This proposal comes amid fragile ceasefire negotiations between Hamas and Israel, with both sides accusing each other of violating terms meant to facilitate the exchange of hostages.

The incident highlights the challenges posed by AI-generated political content, raising questions about current content moderation practices on technology platforms.

Critics, including Nebraska state senator Megan Hunt, have condemned Trump's vision as a violation of international law, while German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock labeled the idea of displacing Palestinians as unacceptable.

Despite attempts by U.S. State Department officials to moderate Trump's vision, the White House continues to characterize it as a 'visionary' idea.

The troubling implications of the video's content extend beyond entertainment, raising concerns about America's global position and the nature of its leadership.

Political analysts suggest that while Trump's use of AI-generated imagery is innovative, such visualizations should not be mistaken for concrete policy proposals.