The Trump administration is proposing significant budget cuts to NASA and NOAA, which would severely impact climate science and research programs.

Specifically, the budget plan suggests slashing the Science Mission Directorate's funding from approximately $7.3 billion to just $3.9 billion for 2026, representing a nearly 50% reduction.

This proposed budget also raises concerns about the future of the Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland, which employs around 10,000 staff and could face closure, resulting in a substantial loss of expertise.

Critics, including climatologist Michael Mann, have condemned these cuts as a 'crime against the planet,' arguing they align with fossil fuel interests and undermine scientific integrity.

Bipartisan opposition has emerged, with leaders from both parties denouncing the cuts as detrimental to national interests and the U.S.'s leadership in space exploration.

Public sentiment has largely been negative, with many expressing fears that these budget cuts reflect a broader governmental de-emphasis on science and technology.

In response to these proposed cuts, various U.S. Representatives and scientific organizations are calling for public action to protect funding for NOAA and NASA.

The uncertainty surrounding the budget has led to fears of a 'brain drain,' as scientists may seek opportunities abroad due to funding uncertainties, potentially benefiting international space agencies.

The future of critical missions, such as the Mars Sample Return program, remains uncertain as they are now subject to scrutiny under the new administration.

The internal document from the administration emphasizes prioritizing energy development initiatives, which could undermine scientific warnings about climate change.

Overall, the proposed budget cuts are viewed as detrimental to understanding and addressing climate change, raising concerns about the long-term impacts on American space science and technology.