1,900 Scientists Warn: Trump Policies Threaten U.S. Scientific Research and Public Health

March 31, 2025
1,900 Scientists Warn: Trump Policies Threaten U.S. Scientific Research and Public Health
  • Plans to reduce the workforce at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration by up to 20% could severely compromise essential weather forecasting capabilities.

  • The National Institutes of Health has faced significant budget cuts, losing billions and affecting over 300,000 scientists who rely on its funding.

  • Approximately 1,900 prominent scientists in the U.S. have issued an open letter expressing concerns about the Trump administration's negative impact on scientific research.

  • These layoffs are expected to impact major agencies, including the National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, threatening critical research and public health initiatives.

  • As part of an effort to reduce the federal workforce, the Department of Health and Human Services has begun laying off thousands of employees, which is part of a broader trend affecting multiple scientific agencies.

  • Elon Musk's initiatives under the administration have led to substantial cuts in essential services, further jeopardizing public safety and scientific integrity.

  • The administration has been accused of censorship, manipulating research funding and publication, particularly on sensitive issues such as climate change and vaccine safety.

  • The National Institutes of Health has halted new grant applications and is issuing layoff notices, raising concerns about the future of disease research.

  • Dr. Steven Woolf has warned that the administration's cuts to health research could have dire consequences for public health and life expectancy in the U.S.

  • Experts are calling for scientific leaders to take a stand against these actions, emphasizing the need to defend science and public health during this critical time.

  • Trump's directives have also targeted diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, which has drawn significant criticism from the scientific community.

  • The administration's list of banned words, including terms like 'gender' and 'bias', is viewed as a direct attack on academic freedom and expression.

Summary based on 19 sources


Get a daily email with more World News stories

Sources


Read the Letter

The New York Times • Mar 31, 2025

Read the Letter



More Stories