Major Law Firms Sue Trump Administration Over Alleged Retaliatory Executive Orders
March 28, 2025
Two prominent law firms, Jenner & Block and WilmerHale, have initiated federal lawsuits against the Trump administration, challenging executive orders that they argue are punitive due to their connections with attorneys involved in investigations against the former president.
The lawsuits assert that these executive orders are unconstitutional and represent a form of government coercion, with Jenner & Block launching a dedicated website, 'Jenner Stands Firm,' to raise awareness about their legal battle.
Legal experts have characterized Trump's campaign against major law firms as unprecedented, warning that it poses a significant constitutional threat and undermines the legal system's integrity.
Both lawsuits claim that the executive orders explicitly reveal an intent to retaliate against the firms for their legal advocacy and connections to politically sensitive investigations.
A previous ruling by U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell indicated that similar actions against Perkins Coie were likely unconstitutional, and she is expected to hear the emergency complaints from Jenner & Block.
The legal industry has been in turmoil since Trump's inauguration, with firms divided on whether to confront the administration or seek accommodation to protect their business interests.
Paul, Weiss reached a settlement with Trump, agreeing to allocate $40 million in pro bono work aligned with his administration's priorities, which has led to backlash from the legal community.
In contrast, some firms, like Munger, Tolles & Olsen, have organized amicus briefs to support Perkins Coie's legal challenges, reflecting a fragmented response within the industry.
Civil rights advocates have called for the legal profession to unify against unconstitutional government actions, emphasizing the need for resilience in defending democratic values.
Prominent attorney Paul Clement has described the lawsuits as vital for upholding the rule of law and protecting First Amendment rights, underscoring the importance of legal representation.
The White House's actions against law firms have raised significant concerns among bar associations and the legal community regarding the implications for the rule of law.
Statements from various law firms highlight the importance of representing unpopular clients and causes, stressing the risks to legal independence posed by the Trump administration's actions.
Summary based on 16 sources
Get a daily email with more US News stories
Sources

The New York Times • Mar 28, 2025
Trump Live Updates: JD Vance to Visit Greenland as Trump Vows Island Takeover
The New York Times • Mar 26, 2025
Big Law Splinters Under a Trump Onslaught
The New York Times • Mar 28, 2025
Trump Targets WilmerHale, Citing Law Firm’s Connection to Robert Mueller
The Guardian • Mar 28, 2025
Two law firms sue after Trump orders target them over links to his opponents