The estate of Michael Crichton has initiated legal action against Warner Bros. Television, alleging that their new medical drama 'The Pitt' is an unauthorized reboot of the iconic series 'ER.'

The lawsuit contends that after the Crichton estate blocked plans for an 'ER' reboot, producer John Wells and star Noah Wyle shifted their focus to 'The Pitt,' which shares numerous similarities with 'ER' in setting, structure, and themes.

Following the breakdown of negotiations for an 'ER' sequel, Wells and R. Scott Gemmill pitched 'The Pitt' to Warner Bros., leading to a 15-episode order announced in March 2024.

The Crichton estate argues that a 'frozen rights' provision established by Crichton prohibits any derivative works based on 'ER' without their consent, a clause they claim Warner Bros. has violated.

The outcome of this legal battle could significantly impact the planned release of 'The Pitt' on Max next year, as the court's decision may influence its future.

Sherri Crichton, the widow of Michael Crichton, filed the lawsuit in California State Superior Court, citing breach of contract and other claims against Warner Bros. Television and associated parties.

The lawsuit highlights a perceived pattern of disrespect for Crichton's legacy, alleging that key figures involved in 'The Pitt' have disregarded his rights and contributions since his passing in 2008.

Despite the estate's willingness to approve a reboot under certain conditions, including a $5 million guarantee, these terms were reportedly rescinded by Warner Bros., leading to the current legal dispute.

The suit emphasizes that 'The Pitt' closely resembles 'ER' in its portrayal of chaotic hospital environments and overworked doctors, raising concerns about its originality.

Warner Bros. has dismissed the lawsuit as baseless, asserting that 'The Pitt' is an original creation and that they will vigorously defend against what they consider meritless claims.

The estate accuses Warner Bros. and the show's creators of betrayal, claiming their actions undermine the long-standing relationship between Crichton and Wells.

This lawsuit not only seeks to protect Crichton's legacy but also highlights ongoing tensions between creative rights and the entertainment industry.