Governor Newsom Delays California's Landmark Plastic Reduction Law, Sparking Environmental Backlash

March 9, 2025
Governor Newsom Delays California's Landmark Plastic Reduction Law, Sparking Environmental Backlash
  • While Newsom's office cited the high cost of implementing the law at $36 billion, they noted that potential economic and environmental benefits could total $40.3 billion.

  • Concerns about the law's future have intensified since industry representatives began lobbying against the regulations in December 2024.

  • Originally signed into law in 2022, SB 54 aimed to reduce single-use plastic packaging by 25% and ensure that 65% of materials are recyclable by 2032.

  • Critics argue that the governor's decision favors the plastics industry over public welfare and environmental protection.

  • Organizations like the Monterey Bay Aquarium and Oceana have expressed disappointment in the delay, suggesting it undermines California's commitment to reducing plastic pollution.

  • California Governor Gavin Newsom has delayed the implementation of the significant plastic reduction law, SB 54, which has sparked backlash from environmentalists.

  • Supporters of the law emphasize the urgent need for action to combat plastic pollution, citing its importance for both environmental and economic health.

  • The law's implementation was initially entrusted to a coalition of industry and environmental stakeholders, raising concerns about the industry's ability to self-regulate.

  • Environmental groups have criticized Newsom's decision to restart the regulatory process, suggesting it prioritizes industry interests over environmental protection.

  • On March 7, 2025, Newsom ordered regulators to restart the rule-making process just before the finalization deadline, citing the need for fair implementation.

  • In 2023, California sold nearly 2.9 million tons of single-use plastics, underscoring the urgent need for effective regulatory action against plastic waste.

  • The law also mandates that packaging producers bear the costs of their products' end-life, alleviating financial burdens on consumers and local governments.

Summary based on 2 sources


Get a daily email with more US News stories

More Stories