Both Democratic and Republican administrations have consistently supported the dismissal of the lawsuit, labeling it as unprecedented and outside the scope of traditional court matters.

The justices did not provide comments on their decision, which confirmed that the youths lacked legal standing to sue due to the absence of a concrete injury.

Miko Vergun, a prominent plaintiff, highlighted the case's role in inspiring over 60 similar lawsuits filed across various states and countries.

Despite setbacks, the plaintiffs remain committed to advocating for climate justice, with plans to pursue new federal legal actions based on similar constitutional principles.

Notable plaintiffs, now aged between 17 and 29, have continued their advocacy, with some pursuing careers in environmental law and education.

In response to the Supreme Court's decision, young activists are exploring international legal avenues and new theories to hold the U.S. accountable for its climate actions.

Judge Andrew D. Hurwitz remarked that the plaintiffs' case should be presented to the government rather than through legal channels, emphasizing the political nature of climate policy.

The lawsuit has inspired a global youth-led climate movement, with Julia Olson from Our Children's Trust noting its influence extends beyond the courtroom.

The lawsuit garnered widespread support, including backing from over 100 members of Congress and more than 400 advocacy groups, illustrating the significant public interest in climate rights.

The case known as Juliana v. United States involved 21 plaintiffs, the youngest being just 8 years old, who contended that the federal government's support of a fossil fuel economy infringed upon their constitutional rights to a sustainable climate.

The Supreme Court's recent decision, which upheld a lower court's dismissal of the case based on procedural issues regarding standing, was met with disappointment from the plaintiffs.

The U.S. Department of Justice expressed satisfaction with the Supreme Court's ruling, marking the end of a lengthy legal saga that spanned three presidential administrations.