The ruling, made on March 19, 2025, followed a legal challenge from advocacy groups who argued that the executive order infringes on the rights to equal protection under the Fifth Amendment.

The decision was welcomed by attorneys representing the plaintiffs, who expressed confidence that it would withstand any appeal from the Department of Justice.

The Department of Justice is expected to appeal the ruling, which may ultimately reach the Supreme Court.

The plaintiffs, including Master Sergeant Ireland and 2nd Lt. Nicolas Talbott, reported being instructed to revert to living as women to remain in service, reflecting the personal impact of the ban.

Both service members are currently facing administrative separation hearings that could terminate their military careers as soon as March 26, 2025.

A federal judge has ruled against the Trump administration's ban on transgender individuals serving in the military, emphasizing the need to uphold equal protection rights.

Reyes highlighted the importance of checks and balances among government branches, reinforcing the judiciary's role in protecting individual rights.

The ruling was praised by LGBTQ+ advocates, who noted that it underscores the commitment of service members to defend the nation despite facing discrimination.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth expressed confidence in winning the appeal, stating on social media, 'We will win this decision.'

The ruling represents a significant victory in the ongoing fight for transgender rights within the military, as advocates continue to push for equality.

Judge Reyes questioned the discriminatory nature of the ban during the proceedings, noting the lack of evidence supporting the administration's claims.

Talbott expressed relief over the ruling, fearing separation from military service due to his gender identity.