Critics are raising ethical concerns over government support for media companies that promote gambling, arguing that this support harms vulnerable gamblers and questions the integrity of dysfunctional media networks.

Public sentiment is overwhelmingly in favor of stricter regulations on gambling advertising, reflecting widespread concern about the societal impact of gambling addiction.

Australians lose more money gambling per capita than any other nation, with an estimated $25 billion lost annually on legal wagering, underscoring the urgent need for reform.

A blanket ban on gambling ads is being suggested as a potential solution to reduce gambling-related harm, similar to the historical success of tobacco advertising bans.

Senator Pocock counters claims that advertising restrictions would hinder gambling participation, emphasizing the overwhelming presence of online and TV ads.

Communications Minister Michelle Rowland is contemplating a partial ban on gambling advertising, following recommendations for a full ban from a recent review.

Health experts argue that gambling marketing sends positive messages about the industry to children, suggesting that a partial ban would not sufficiently address this issue.

Kai Cantwell, CEO of Responsible Wagering Australia, advocates for caps on the volume and frequency of gambling advertising to better protect Australian consumers.

The gambling industry opposes a total advertising ban, claiming it would push consumers towards illegal overseas gambling sites that lack necessary consumer protections.

Independent senator David Pocock highlights the negative social impacts of gambling, including increased rates of suicides and domestic violence, and insists that the sustainability of free TV should be addressed separately.

Free TV warns that banning gambling ads could severely impact the financial viability of commercial television broadcasters, raising concerns about the loss of advertising revenue.