Ramaswamy Slams NYC's $220M Roosevelt Hotel Deal for Migrants, Sparks Immigration Spending Debate

December 1, 2024
Ramaswamy Slams NYC's $220M Roosevelt Hotel Deal for Migrants, Sparks Immigration Spending Debate
  • The details of the hotel rental agreement were first reported by the Pakistani newspaper Dawn, highlighting the international dimensions of local immigration issues.

  • Vivek Ramaswamy has publicly criticized New York City's decision to pay $220 million in rent for the Roosevelt Hotel, which is owned by the Pakistani government, to accommodate illegal migrants.

  • This arrangement, which involves housing migrants in the Roosevelt Hotel, underscores the ongoing challenges U.S. cities face in managing the influx of migrants amidst a significant crisis.

  • Under Mayor Eric Adams' administration, the hotel has been transformed into a vital intake center for asylum seekers, providing essential services as migrant arrivals surge.

  • Pakistan is leveraging this rental deal to generate revenue amid an economic crisis, aiming to alleviate its financial burdens.

  • The deal has sparked renewed debates about immigration spending, government waste, and the prioritization of public funds in the U.S.

  • The Roosevelt Hotel, a 19-storey landmark in Manhattan, had been closed since 2020 but reopened in 2024 under this lease agreement.

  • The hotel was previously dormant and in disrepair before this agreement, which aligns with Pakistan's broader economic stabilization efforts.

  • Critics argue that the arrangement raises concerns about taxpayer money being used for foreign-owned properties while highlighting the complexities of U.S. immigration policies.

  • Notable figures, including Elon Musk, have expressed outrage over the situation, labeling it as 'crazy' and emphasizing the implications for taxpayer dollars.

  • This controversy adds to the ongoing political discourse surrounding illegal immigration, a focal point for President-elect Donald Trump's campaign.

  • Ramaswamy's comments have been criticized for oversimplifying the financial complexities of the agreement, reflecting the contentious nature of the political landscape.

Summary based on 20 sources


Get a daily email with more World News stories

More Stories