Kennedy has claimed that Donald Trump promised him control over various public health agencies, which could enable him to promote his controversial health theories.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a prominent figure in the medical freedom movement and member of the Kennedy family, has increasingly distanced himself from the Democratic Party, advocating for controversial public health reforms.

His 'Make America Healthy Again' proposals aim to reform food policy, investigate environmental health factors, and reduce the pharmaceutical industry's influence.

Kennedy has proposed banning fluoride in drinking water, to which Trump responded positively, indicating a potential shift in public health policy.

Despite the ongoing debate over fluoride in drinking water, Republican leaders emphasize that voters are more concerned with pressing issues like crime and unemployment.

The debate over fluoride has intensified, with health experts examining its implications on public health, especially given that approximately 209 million Americans receive fluoridated water.

Kennedy's past actions have been linked to a measles outbreak in Samoa, which resulted in significant fatalities, highlighting the real-world consequences of his anti-vaccine rhetoric.

He has criticized major health agencies like the FDA for allegedly suppressing alternative treatments and has called for broader acceptance of various health approaches.

Kennedy's positions on vaccines and public health have raised alarms among both Democrats and some Republicans, prompting vigilance from biopharmaceutical companies.

He has a history of criticizing health agencies for serving industry interests rather than prioritizing public health.

As the political climate heats up with the upcoming presidential debate, Kennedy's controversial views and proposals could significantly influence public discourse.

Kennedy's statements regarding vaccines and public health have sparked significant backlash, including claims that the COVID-19 vaccine is the 'deadliest vaccine ever made,' despite lacking credible evidence.