The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the decision of U.S. Magistrate Judge S. Kato Crews, who deemed the plaintiffs' request for an emergency injunction as unreasonable.

As a result of forfeits from several teams, San Jose State advanced to the finals of the tournament without actual competition, winning seven games by default.

The case has garnered significant media attention and public backlash, with political figures and activist groups becoming involved, particularly after the viral spread of a misrepresented video of Fleming's play.

Judge Crews emphasized that maintaining the current situation—Fleming's participation—was essential, as the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate irreparable harm.

A federal judge ruled on November 25, 2024, affirming that Blaire Fleming, a transgender player on the San Jose State women's volleyball team, is eligible to compete in the upcoming Mountain West Conference tournament.

This situation has ignited broader discussions about transgender rights in sports, with more than two dozen states enacting laws to restrict transgender women from competing in women's sports.

The plaintiffs, including SJSU co-captain Brooke Slusser, allege that the university and the conference suppressed free speech regarding gender identity and retaliated against a coach who filed a discrimination complaint.

Internal conflict has arisen within the team, as some members, including Slusser, have reportedly advocated for Fleming's removal, leading to distress among players.

Prior to this controversy, San Jose State's women's volleyball program had been relatively low-profile, last winning a conference title in 1985.

In response to the ruling, San Jose State University expressed relief and reaffirmed its commitment to supporting all student-athletes and opposing discrimination.

The ruling comes amidst significant controversy, as some opposing teams, including Nevada and Boise State, have refused to compete against San Jose State, citing concerns over fairness and player safety.