Democrats contend that the funding for disaster relief is inadequate and accuse Republicans of favoring wealthy families through the expansion of the Opportunity Scholarship program at the expense of small business aid.

The Opportunity Scholarship program has been expanded to allow families of all income levels to access private school vouchers, a significant shift from its previous focus on low- and middle-income households.

Opposition to the bill is strong among Democrats, who argue it exacerbates funding issues for public schools and lacks accountability for the expanded voucher program.

Critics, including election expert David Becker, warn that the bill's changes to election oversight could disenfranchise voters and complicate the electoral process.

The bill faced significant pushback during Senate debates, leading to protests and disruptions, highlighting the contentious nature of the legislative process.

Governor Roy Cooper condemned the bill for its political motivations and its failure to adequately support communities affected by Hurricane Helene.

Concerns have been raised regarding the bill's lack of consultation with election experts, which could have serious implications for future elections.

On November 20, 2024, North Carolina Republican legislators passed a controversial 131-page bill aimed at reducing the authority of the incoming Democratic governor and other elected officials.

Cooper's proposed $3.9 billion recovery plan aims to rebuild homes and support local businesses, emphasizing the extensive damage caused by the hurricane.

The ACLU of North Carolina has labeled the legislation an 'unconstitutional, undemocratic power grab,' arguing it undermines the electoral choices of the state's voters.

The bill was passed without thorough committee hearings or multiple votes, repurposing an existing dental services bill, which has raised further concerns about transparency and public input.

The legislation allocates $227 million for Hurricane Helene relief, including $50 million for ongoing housing projects from previous disasters, but critics argue it prioritizes political interests over immediate disaster assistance.