The European Commission has proposed a one-year delay for the implementation of a new regulation aimed at combating global deforestation, which was originally set to take effect at the end of this year.

This delay, which pushes the implementation to December 30, 2025, for large companies and June 30, 2026, for small and micro-enterprises, is subject to approval by EU member states and the European Parliament.

The postponement has been influenced by pressure from various stakeholders, including cocoa-producing countries and major businesses, who requested more time to comply with the stringent requirements.

This regulation is part of the broader EU strategies, including the European Green Deal, which aims to address environmental impacts linked to agricultural expansion and ensure product traceability in supply chains.

Supporters of the regulation argue that it is essential for global forest conservation, as deforestation is a significant source of carbon emissions, second only to fossil fuels.

Critics of the delay, including environmental organizations and some political figures, argue that it undermines global climate goals and express disappointment over the EU's retreat from environmental leadership.

The regulation, which applies to commodities such as coffee, cocoa, rubber, palm oil, soy, beef, and timber, is seen as crucial for sustainable practices globally, impacting international trade relationships.

The Commission cited feedback from international partners and concerns about the law's implementation as reasons for the extension, indicating a desire for better preparation for compliance.

While the delay has been positively received by some in the business sector, critics worry it could lead to a weakening of the regulation and push for measures to maintain its integrity.

Germany and other EU member states have called for an extension, citing concerns over excessive bureaucracy and the need for clearer compliance guidelines.

The delay follows months of protests from farmers and coffee roasters, highlighting the ongoing tension between environmental regulations and economic interests.

Ultimately, the Commission claims the delay is intended to strengthen international cooperation, but critics argue it prioritizes economic interests over environmental protection.