France's End-of-Life Legislation Faces Split, Sparks Heated Debate
January 22, 2025François Bayrou has proposed splitting the contentious end-of-life legislation into two separate laws: one focusing on palliative care and the other on assisted dying, a move that has sparked significant debate.
This legislative effort was initially introduced by Gabriel Attal's government but was interrupted due to the dissolution of the Assembly in the summer of 2024.
Despite the controversy, government spokesperson Sophie Primas reassured that the administration remains committed to advancing the legal aid to die project, emphasizing that it will not be abandoned.
This decision represents a pivotal moment in a legislative process that has been ongoing for several years, eliciting strong reactions from both political factions and civil society.
Critics, including Deputy Olivier Falorni, argue that separating the two issues undermines progress, insisting that both palliative care and assisted dying should be addressed concurrently.
Primas defended the separation, asserting that it respects individual freedoms and allows Parliament to vote on each issue distinctly, while also addressing concerns about the legislative process.
Supporters of the split, such as the French Society for Palliative Care, argue that it could expedite discussions on palliative care, which have been stalled by the association with the more divisive topic of assisted dying.
Conversely, the Association for the Right to Die with Dignity criticized the split, suggesting it may lead to inaction and appease opponents of euthanasia.
The initiative highlights the ongoing tension between differing views on end-of-life issues in France, as the government attempts to navigate the complexities of public opinion and legislative priorities.
Braun-Pivet has expressed a desire to resume parliamentary discussions on the matter in early February 2025, indicating a push for a comprehensive approach.
The Prime Minister's office clarified that this decision aims to distinguish between palliative care, viewed as a societal obligation, and assisted dying, which is considered a matter of personal conscience.
However, this proposal has drawn criticism from advocates for assisted dying; notably, Yaël Braun-Pivet, President of the National Assembly, has publicly opposed the split and called for the immediate reintroduction of the full legislative text.
Summary based on 7 sources