The delayed broadcast of Donald Trump's swearing-in ceremony by RTBF, a Belgian television channel, has ignited a fierce debate about media responsibility and governance.

RTBF's choice to delay the broadcast was defended by the Society of Journalists, which emphasized the legal and ethical basis for their editorial decisions.

Bouchez accused proponents of tolerance of hypocrisy, asserting that they are the most intolerant when it comes to media choices.

The journalists' association defended RTBF against accusations of censorship, affirming the integrity of their decision in light of potential risks associated with Trump's rhetoric.

Bouchez emphasized the importance of respecting democratic elections, arguing that media bias should not undermine the electoral process.

Galant highlighted that all Francophone media aired Trump's oath of office live, questioning why RTBF opted for a delayed broadcast.

Jacqueline Galant, the Minister of Media in the Wallonia-Brussels Federation, expressed surprise at RTBF's decision, questioning its effectiveness since other francophone media outlets aired the speech live.

The Council of Journalism Ethics in Belgium supports responsible editorial decisions, stating that freedom of expression does not require media to broadcast all opinions.

The ongoing debate reflects broader concerns about media governance and the balance between editorial freedom and the responsibility to prevent harmful rhetoric.

Left-wing opposition members reacted with outrage to the media's decision, illustrating the divisive nature of the issue.

This practice emerged after the extreme right party Vlaams Blok gained significant electoral success in 1991, prompting calls for responsible media coverage.

Aurélie Didier, RTBF's deputy editorial director, explained that the practice of delaying broadcasts to prevent the normalization of extreme views has been in place for years.