Both parties align closely on socio-economic policies, security, asylum, and migration, reflecting a shared vision of the state.

All five parties involved in the negotiations recognize the urgent need to cut state expenses, with discussions suggesting a reduction of 20 to 25 billion euros over the legislative term.

Georges-Louis Bouchez of MR emphasizes that Belgium, which has over 330 billion euros in public spending, should prioritize reducing expenses and reforming inefficient structures instead of seeking additional funding.

In Belgium, the MR (Mouvement Réformateur) and N-VA (Nieuw-Vlaamse Alliantie) parties are finding common ground on most issues, although they diverge on institutional matters.

The negotiations are protracted, necessitating a detailed agreement to implement significant reforms swiftly, particularly after a six-month delay.

Bouchez highlights the precariousness of Belgium's economic situation, stressing the importance of timely governmental action to secure the country's future.

He expresses concern about financial markets, warning that without urgent reforms, Belgium may face rising interest rates and economic stagnation.

Fiscal policy remains a contentious issue among the negotiating parties, with varying perspectives on budgetary efforts.

Bouchez advocates for integration and assimilation in migration policy, reflecting a broader approach to the issue.

The negotiations reveal a nuanced opposition between MR and N-VA against three other parties: Engagés, CD&V (Christen-Democratisch en Vlaams), and Vooruit.

Bouchez supports the inclusion of all party leaders in the next federal government, underscoring the seriousness of the current situation.

He suggests that if a party president does not join the government, the second-in-command, such as David Clarinval of MR, should be considered for inclusion.