Currently, more than 80 state and 30 federal draft laws related to AI safety are under consideration, as regulators like the FTC focus on data privacy issues.

To ensure accountability and public safety, lawmakers are urged to regulate AI technologies, as voluntary commitments from companies may not suffice.

California's progressive legislative approach often sets standards that influence policies on both national and international levels.

The passage of these bills may inspire similar legislation addressing AI-related issues at both state and federal levels in the near future.

Proponents of the bill, including Senator Scott Wiener, argued that enforceable regulations are essential to protect the public from potential AI-related harms.

This ongoing debate reflects broader global challenges in regulating rapidly evolving technology, particularly in areas like privacy and security.

California Governor Gavin Newsom recently vetoed bill SB 1047, which sought to regulate large AI systems, citing concerns over innovation and public safety perceptions.

The proposed legislation specifically targeted powerful AI systems that require substantial resources to develop, a threshold that current models have not yet reached.

Industry leaders are encouraged to collaborate with the government to create practical safety regulations that do not stifle innovation.

While frameworks like the NIST AI Risk Management Framework are seen as positive, experts emphasize that enforceable laws are necessary for compliance with AI safety standards.

Globally, there is a consensus on the need for AI regulations, yet no legislation as comprehensive as SB 1047 has been enacted, with the EU's AI Act being the most significant effort to date.

A board of experts is proposed to be established to continuously update regulations as AI capabilities evolve, ensuring ongoing relevance.